Loans, credit cards, mortgages and bank account comparison, guide and listings.
Car, home, pet, cycle, travel, life insurance listings and content.
Broadband package comparison, tools and content.
Home Phone and VOIP comparison and switching service.
Gas and Electicity comparison and switching service.
Digital TV package listings, prices and content.
Read and respond to our writer’s consumer based observations
home   contact us  about us  accessibility  glossary  register  login   
  
 

Search: 

 
Refer this page to a friend
Print this page
Find out more about text sizes

Broadband News

 
| Text size | Post a comment | 2 comments |
Bookmark with:

The BBC should not pay for the iPlayer

Garnet Roach

The BBC shouldn’t be forced to pay for the development of next generation broadband networks Ofcom’s chief executive has told MPs. (23-04-08)

Broadband providers have seen internet traffic increase massively since the full-scale launch of its BBC iPlayer catch-up service on Christmas Day last year, with top shows such as Dr Who, Tortchwood and Ashes to Ashes attracting around 50,000 hits a day.

Earlier this month, Tiscali (www.Tiscali.co.uk) said that the BBC should be forced to contribute public funds towards upgrading the country’s networks, while Virgin Media (www.VirginMedia.com) has warned of higher prices if congestion continued to increase.

However, Ed Richards, Ofcom chief executive, told a joint session of the Commons Culture, Media & Sport and Business and Enterprise committees that this was just one option that the telecoms regulator was considering.

But he added: “It is not necessarily the only way it can happen and it is not necessarily the way we would anticipate it will happen.

“I am not convinced myself that the right answer to that is to get the BBC to pay for the iPlayer.”

Richards confirmed that Ofcom would not rule out “content-led tariff models” where ISPs do deals with content providers to prioritise that traffic on their networks.

Michael Phillips, BroadbandChoices.co.uk product director, said: “Network traffic is increasing all the time, and although Ofcom appears to have ruled out major broadcasters contributing towards the cost of streaming their content, a solution must be found or ISPs will have to start increasing headline prices and applying even more restrictions to their connections during peak hours.”

Install our free Broadband Download Monitor to keep track of your downloads.

| Text size | Post a comment | 2 comments |
Bookmark with:

 
 

 

We want your views, register and comment on this article

Your Name:
Email: Already Registered?
Town and Country (Optional):
Phone Number (Optional):

We will contact you if we can help with your issue, your number will not be given to any third party.

Terms and Conditions Apply

 
 

 

2 people have commented on The BBC should not pay for the iPlayer.

  1. Why should the BBC pay to upgrade the internet, the ISP's are the one's making the money from their alleged "upto 8Mb speeds". If they are serious about giving us a value for money service then they should pay for the upgrade. If they supply 8Mb speeds then all pc's should be fitted with an ISP's Broadband moniter & a pro rata tariff can then be applied.
    - Stephen Loughran, UK, Apr 30 2008 7:33PMPost a comment | Report Abuse
     
  2. Sorry, I believe the BBC iPlayer service is great. It is one of the view 'free' services that allow legal downloads of TV material etc.
    Meanwhile the real issues continue to be related to pirate downloads of music and, to some extent, movies. This is where the real bottlenecks are.

    Also, the UK is supposed to be a technologically advanced nation, up there with the US, Japan etc. But, due, in part to corporate greed, the infrastructure is old and decrepit. Consequently, things like boroadband speed and bandwidth is limited, not by use but by the ancient network of copper cabling.
    The same short sightedness is true of the water industry, the rail networks etc etc.

    We pay a lot in our taxes and national insurance but we see very little or no evidence that the money is being used effectively.
    - Peter Lugg, Bristol, Apr 28 2008 11:37PMPost a comment | Report Abuse
     
 
 
Page Last Updated: Tuesday, 29-Apr-08